(Video) How Many People Are Dateable?

You may have seen me write about what percentage of people are dateable…but you’ve probably never seen me ask a room full of singles before.

Notice how silent it gets when people finally realize that nobody’s good enough for a second date. I can understand why no one would want to lower his/her standards, of course, but what does it say about you if you can’t find anybody suitable to date? And what if everyone else in the world had such similarly high standards that YOU could never make the cut?

YouTube Preview Image

0
1

Join 5 Million Readers

And the thousands of women I've helped find true love. Sign up for weekly updates for help understanding men.

I hate spam as much as you do, therefore I will never sell, rent, or give away your email address.

Join our conversation (148 Comments).
Click Here To Leave Your Comment Below.

Comments:

  1. 91
    Kristyn

    Heather
    I’m a sag. I knew you weren’t serious. I have had the same frustrations as you, the guys I like rudely don’t reciprocate the feeling, the guys with huge red flags or the ones who are excited about me and I can’t find any interest in them, massive amounts of really odd people online; ah, the joys of dating. IT is really hard to keep dating, keep getting your hopes up, keep being positive time after time after time.

    On this other topic of being dateable, I’m so glad there is such a huge variety of people in the world. Not every one has a high I.Q. Wouldn’t it be awful to struggle intellectually and be married to someone highly intelligent? I’d hate for the person I loved most in the world to think I was beneath them intelligent wise (or worse to think I was dumb) or really in any area of life.

  2. 92
    Heather

    Kristyn – good to know it isn’t just me and that everyone experiences dating misery!

    Regarding intelligence – it’s good, but there’s nothing worse than a smart guy who’s cocky about it! I think I’d rather have a sweet dimwit.

  3. 93
    Karl R

    Helen said: (#86)
    “Though we women say we want smart men, it isn’t so much the raw brainpower that matters to us as the fact that on average, smart men tend to have it all together more. We don’t want to date or marry someone whom we have to mother. We do like caring for our special man, but we don’t want him to be dependent on us for basic life needs.”

    Sayanta said: (#88)
    “Here’s an article relating less education to anger [...] And, I guess, a point for those of us who insist on educated SOs.”

    Let’s say that I want a dependable car. I decide to buy a foreign car, because they on average are more dependable than American-made cars. That “on average” won’t make my car more dependable if I end up buying a Yugo. I’d do much better selecting a car (foreign or domestic) based on its track record for reliability.

    If you want a man who can take care of himself without your help, look for that trait. If you want a man who doesn’t get angry easily, look for that trait.

    It really simplifies your search if you just look for the traits that you actually want and need.

  4. 94
    Helen

    Karl R, I wonder if you’re missing the point.

    “It really simplifies your search if you just look for the traits that you actually want and need.”

    I’ve never online-dated in my life, but am pretty sure there’s no easy way to tell on an online site whether a man can take care of himself without a woman’s help or whether he gets angry easily. The information that IS offered, as I understand it, is education level. Absent the other useful information described above, it makes sense that women would use the information they DO have (education) to make estimates about other traits regarding the man.

  5. 95
    Sayanta

    As -I think- is evident from my previous posts, I’d like to find a man who wants to advance himself on all possible levels (emotionally, physically, materially, and, if relevant, spiritually). I’ve done (and attempt to continue to do) the same for myself.

    The argument about whether college = brains, ambition, etc. could go on forever. And ever. And ever. I think it’s pretty safe to say that college degrees generally open more social and economic avenues for people. So if I meet someone who has that degree, I’m operating under the assumption that this person cares about expanding his opportunities in life- which is an admirable trait, one that I think I have, and one that I would like my husband to have.

    I’ve met people who grew up in the ghetto, worked HARD putting themselves through college and grad school. Did they want to quit? Hell yeah- try working at a thankless job and spending the few hours you have expending the energy toward classes and exams. But they didn’t, because they knew about the opportunities out there.

    Then I have known middle-class people (mostly men) who decided that college education was bourgeoise, and they wanted to stick it to THE MAN by dropping out.

    Well, about 10 years later, those students who worked through college, grad school, etc., are pretty satisfied (some of them have their s-t together better than I do), and the ones who dropped out keep complaining about their finances and their lack of opportunity- issues that might be resolved if they went back to school. But going back to school would be selling out. Hey, it’s their life.

    And Yes, Yes, Yes- I know there are exceptions to everything I have stated above. That doesn’t change my opinion about whom I want to marry. And since I’m not a stickler about grad school, and there are a decent number of male college graduates in my age range, I don’t think I’ll have a problem. Yes, I admit I may have to compromise on some other criteria, but oh well.

    And- Yes, I know that men who work in vocational trades are hard workers too. And that they make a shitload of money sometimes. This is where educational/class differences might come in though. I grew up pretty well-off, going to lots of cultural events, traveling, etc.

    And, again, I realize there may be exceptions to this, but most plumbers, auto mechanics, etc. probably did not grow up the way I did. Does this mean they’re not good-hearted family men? Of course not! But am I going to be able to relate to someone on an intimate level when we have polar opposite backgrounds, along with ideas on finances and child-rearing? I doubt it.

  6. 96
    J.A.

    @Mr_Right:

    I totally agree about Eharmony being better than other sites because people seem to be more ‘serious’ on there as well as less superficial. I also feel that what part of the country you’re from can play a role in online dating and dating in general. I’m from NY and here the women (in general) tend to be more on the superficial side. What part of the country are you from?

  7. 97
    downtowngal

    Sayanta #95 brings up some good points, and reminds me of another one – it’s not just education levels, it’s values. I’ve dated guys who are contractors/plumbers, many of these are good guys w their own businesses and are very street-wise; however what didn’t do it for me was that we didn’t share the same values. I would want to support my kids in having the best academic opportunities available, and these guys had different priorities in that regard. Doesn’t mean they’re bad guys or that I’m to picky, just not for me.

  8. 98
    Karl R

    Helen said: (#94)
    “Absent the other useful information described above, it makes sense that women would use the information they DO have (education) to make estimates about other traits regarding the man.”

    If you’re looking for a man who has his act together, you could look at a few other pieces of information which are available: income, profession, and living situation. Is the man living with his parents or a roommate? How much is he making? What kind of job does he have? All of those are listed in the profile.

    If you want to know how a man handles anger, ask him about his last relationship. Does he seem bitter? Does he blame the woman for everything that went wrong in the relationship? You can get this information out of someone during your first phone call or your first date.

    For some people, it makes sense to filter out people quickly by whatever information is available. If one hundred women are interested in me, I should narrow the pool down to the few who are most likely to be good matches.

    If I’m only going on one first date a month, I have the time to take a closer look at women who might turn out to be exceptions to my initial estimates.

    Sayanta said: (#95)
    “I’d like to find a man who wants to advance himself on all possible levels (emotionally, physically, materially, and, if relevant, spiritually). I’ve done (and attempt to continue to do) the same for myself.”

    If I understand you correctly, you feel your criteria are reasonable since you expect no less from yourself.

    “there are a decent number of male college graduates in my age range, I don’t think I’ll have a problem.”

    If that was your main criteria, or one of a few criteria, I’d say you would have a point. But you’ve stated that your partner:

    1. Must be trying to advance himself materially (ambitious).
    2. Must be trying to advance himself physically.
    3. Must be trying to advance himself emotionally.
    4. Must be no more than six years older than you.
    5. Must be interested in having children.
    6. Can’t be of an ethnic background that has a conservative view of a woman’s role (which includes most men of your own ethnic background).
    7. Must be sexually attractive.
    8. Must have a bachelors’ degree.
    9. Must be intelligent. (An important distinction, since there are some people with degrees who fall short in the intelligence department.)
    10. Must have good character.
    11. Must be healthy.
    12. Must be interested in spirituality.
    13. Can’t be a conservative Republican.
    14. Must have an interest in great literature and (or?) great art.
    15. Can’t be socially awkward.
    16. Must be passionate.
    17. Must be willing to wait until marriage for sex.
    18. Any others that I’m unaware of. (non-smokers?)

    Since you meet (or exceed) all of these criteria, you believe that it’s reasonable that your future partner meets all of these criteria too.

    Imagine this hypothetical scenario: You meet a man who meets all of these criteria … and not just at the minimum. He has season tickets to the symphony. He can quote Chaucer and Dante. He paints for a hobby. He has a terrific personality. You like this guy. He’s everything you could want in a man.

    Furthermore, he finds you attractive, fascinating and funny. He genuinely enjoys being around you.

    But you don’t quite meet his standards … because he likes to play tennis competitively (as an amateur), and he wants a girlfriend/wife who can be his mixed-doubles partner. And even if you play tennis, you just aren’t up to his level.

    Do you think that expectation is unreasonable? He meets it. Why shouldn’t his girlfriend? Your date’s list of criteria won’t be identical to your own, and he/she will have a different order of importance as well.

    It’s always possible to add one more standard to the list … and that standard will rule a few more potential dates out.

    Sayanta said: (#52)
    “I’ve never been in anything serious at all! And I haven’t met wonderful guys, period.”

    So there’s something wrong with all of the straight, single men in New York City?

    In that list of 17 (or more) characteristics that you’re looking for, I skipped over the one characteristic that actually matters. “He accepts you just the way you are.” Evan found that in his wife. I found that in my girlfriend. My girlfriend found that in me.

    If I’m understanding you correctly, you can’t find any men that meets your standards. There’s not one man (whom you’ve met) that you can accept just the way he is. If that’s true, that means you lack the only trait that’s essential in a relationship.

    That kind of turns the whole picture around, doesn’t it?

  9. 100
    Selena

    Karl,
    I also really liked your conclusion in #98.

    And what Helen wrote in # 64: about one of the most important things is compatibility of personalities.

    This goes along with something Evan has written on this blog before about his wife, “She “gets” me.

    Isn’t that what we all really want in partner – someone who truly “gets” us?

    Seems to me, the longer an arbitrary list of “must haves” one has when it comes to a potential partner, the less likely they are to meet those souls who might actually “get” them. Simply because they are too focused on the externals – the creditentials – as it were. If that hasn’t been working perhaps it’s time to pare down, or toss the list?

  10. 101
    Karl R

    Evan and Selena, thanks for the compliment. Evan, go ahead and use that example whenever you like.

    And I think Selena (#100) and I (#98) are making the same point in different ways.

  11. 102
    Helen

    Thanks Evan and Selena.

    I personally tend not to worry too much about lists: my own or anyone else’s. Hasn’t everyone had the experience in which they thought they required A, B, and C in a man or a woman; and then they meet someone who doesn’t have all or any of those, but they adore that person anyway and realize s/he’s the right one? I know I have in the past. And the list gets thrown right out the window.

    But maybe it’s easier for me to say since I’ve never done online dating… and this gets back to a point that Karl (or someone else earlier) mentioned about simply going out and meeting people in person, as much as possible. Then you’ll discover all those wonderful people who wouldn’t have made the first cut on your lists.

  12. 103
    Selena

    @ Helen #102:
    That’s always been my experience. I’ve never done online dating either, and while I can see Evan’s point in it’s value – a way to meet thousands of people instantaneously- perhaps the “filtering” aspect of it is being taken too seriously, too far, by some. It was Paul #9 who wrote about meeting people, getting to know them, deciding to date, and finding the size of their nose, whatever, doesn’t matter at all.

    Online dating seems to be a bit like “wish list” catalogue shopping: if the Armani suit and the flannel shirt are the same price, why not try to order the Armani? Though it may not get shipped to your address – or when you open the package…you find it’s a dreadful fit.

    If one is using an arbitrary list to pick and choose through online profiles, are they doing the same in offline life? “Not enough education – not interested.” “Doesn’t make enough money – not interested.” “Not 5’10″ or over – not interested.” Etc., etc. It’s only by talking to someone you find out if you have compatible personalities (love that)…or not.

    And when you do find that? List? What list? I had a list? Oh yeah, but what did I know then! :)

  13. 104
    Selena

    Sayanta,

    Since you are so interested in the arts, do you have a job in that field? If not, have you considered volunteering?

    I live near two small museums that are asking for volunteers for the season (I live in Fl). A few years ago I worked for a company that donated to them. Volunteering for arts organizations you patronize, either by working on the premises, or out in the city drumming up potential support, might be a way for you to meet men who at least have a passing interest, if not a passion shared. A place to start, yes?

  14. 105
    Janet

    Karl R @ 98: Aren’t you the one with the backup in case it doesn’t work out with current GF? How does this jibe with “accepting her the way she is”? And does she know and accept that you have a potential spare in the background should things not work out (“working out” being what, anyway)? Just saying….

    Hang in there, Sayanta. I don’t think your list is unreasonable. You can find a partnership that is mutually satisfying to you and your guy. Even in New York, though it is a tough town. (Did my grad work there–in the arts! :) )

    You only need one special guy–so hats off to you for knowing yourself well enough to avoid all those who would be inappropriate. What a waste of time dating noncontenders is if you have very specific desires in a mate.

    My SO is also in the arts–and I can tell you that the stereotypes about artistic men on this board do not apply. He is extremely responsible, very kind and insightful, well compensated for his work (as am I), and respectful of women. But yes, he is a rare bird, and I feel so very lucky to be with him.

  15. 106
    Sayanta

    Janet-

    THANK YOU for understanding my POINT!

    btw- may I ask how you found your SO? :-)

    The thing that no one seemed to be getting about my “list” is that most of it goes to character, personality, and interests, and how a couple can mesh without these things is beyond me.

    If I was saying something like, I MUST date someone who’s over 6 feet and he MUST have blond hair and green eyes- blue won’t do- then, yeah, that would be pretty ridiculous.

    But, you know what, people can argue on this board all they want: it all goes down to the same thing. People have different opinions about life in general, and writing lengthy debates about a person’s view is not going to change that person’s view. It’s like telling a Republican to become a Democrat, for Chrissake.

  16. 107
    Sayanta

    Janet-

    One more thing: sorry to be nosy, but mind if I ask what kind of work your SO and yourself do? No titles necessary or anything- I’m looking to change careers, and trying to get ideas. :-)

    Heather (or was it someone else?) made a good point. If I want to meet a certain kind of man, it’s good to have a career where I meet those kind of men, right? lol Not that man-hunting is my reason for the career change- I’m just sayin’…

  17. 108
    Karl R

    Janet asked: (#105)
    “Karl R, aren’t you the one with the backup in case it doesn’t work out with current GF?”

    Yes. However, as our relationship has progressed, that has appeared to be increasingly unnecessary.

    “How does this jibe with ‘accepting her the way she is’?”

    Accepting her the way she is does not imply that she will necessarily accept me the way I am.

    Furthermore, I may accept someone the way they are, yet still have incompatible goals. In my previous serious relationship, my ex-girlfriend wanted lots of kids, while I wanted none. We’re still friends, and I hope that she finds someone who will be a wonderful husband and father. But I’m not intersted in being a father.

    ” ‘working out’ being what, anyway)?”

    For convenience sake, let’s call it a long-term, exclusive relationship.

    “And does she know and accept that you have a potential spare in the background should things not work out”

    I may have mentioned it to her, but I don’t remember for certain. I can’t imagine that the idea would bother her … particularly in context of the initial stages of our relationship.

    We’d been acquainted for 10 months before we ever had a conversation that lasted more than a few minutes. During that first long conversation, my girlfriend told me that she wasn’t interested in a serious relationship with me. Instead, there was a widower and long-time friend of hers that she was interested in. However, she was open to dating casually (and implied that a casual sexual relationship might also be a possibility).

    I initially expected our relationship to be a week-long fling (our group was on a week-long cruise), followed by some non-exclusive dating while I continued looking for a serious relationship.

    By the end of that week, I’d decided that I would postpone dating anyone else in order to see where things led. At the three-month mark, I confirmed that the widower was no longer in the picture (though I had suspected it for weeks).

    But I’ll try to remember to mention this to my girlfriend to see if she has specific comments to add.

    Janet said: (#105)
    “hats off to you [Sayanta] for knowing yourself well enough to avoid all those who would be inappropriate. What a waste of time dating noncontenders is if you have very specific desires in a mate.”

    Would you extend the same congratulations to a 40-year-old, balding, divorcee, truck driver who wants a beautiful, classy lady 10-15 years his junior? He has very specific desires in a mate, and he’s not wasting his time dating noncontenders.

    Just saying….

  18. 109
    Janet

    Karl: Yes, I would extend the same congratulations if he felt that that was truly what he wanted. In truth, I have seen it happen. In almost every case it was a situation where the man was an older, white, middle-/upper-class American and the younger, beautiful woman was from a less-priveleged, foreign background, but who can say that they aren’t both happy with that arrangement. As a matter of fact, I would highly recommend those foreign dating sites for American men who want youth and beauty but who aren’t real contenders for the supermodels they fantasize about. There are many women who are willing to trade youth and beauty for security. If both parties win and are happy, why should anyone care about the why?

    Sayanta: My SO and I are both classical musicians and we met on a project several years ago. We also teach and write. I know many creative people, and the trick to being financially viable is to have many income streams and to be smart about money. You can meet a lot of interesting people through your work–whether it’s your creative work or your bread-and-butter job.

    The idea of compromise isn’t alien to us–we do compromise every time we play a job that isn’t up to our standards (and there are many of them :) ). But we didn’t compromise or settle for each other. We were drawn to each other out of a shared passion for our work and a very strong mutual respect. Doesn’t hurt that we’re both very attracted to each other, too!! Will admit that we weren’t drawn t0 each other at first–the work eclipsed all else. We knew each other for awhile before we got together, too. So there were no nervous dates or anything like that. I don’t believe that this is the usual way that people find each other. It worked for us.

    And I agree with you, Sayanta, that your list speaks more to character, personality and interests than to the superficial, which Karl’s example speaks to. It takes all kinds to make the world go ’round, so no judgment of eithrer way. Sayanta, your uniqueness will have its own rewards, both professionally and interpersonally, so you can take what you need here and leave the rest. This site does seem to be more for cookie-cutter dating relationships and not very open to those who are looking for something outside the formula. But there are plenty of nonformulaic people out there, and yes, you will find them in the arts.

    It is tough to be an independent thinker and buck the so-called norm, but the rewards are great. :) Best of luck with it!!!

  19. 110
    Sayanta

    Janet-

    Thanks so much for your uplifting post- I’m glad that you and your SO found each other, and I wish you the best. You’ve also given me hope! :-)

  20. 111
    A-L

    In #98 Karl wrote that Sayanta’s wishlist appeared like the following:

    <I>
    1. Must be trying to advance himself materially (ambitious).
    2. Must be trying to advance himself physically. pretty much the same as #11
    3. Must be trying to advance himself emotionally.
    4. Must be no more than six years older than you.
    5. Must be interested in having children. <B> majority of the dating pool
    6. Can’t be of an ethnic background that has a conservative view of a woman’s role (which includes most men of your own ethnic background). majority of the dating pool
    7. Must be sexually attractive. <B> **
    8. Must have a bachelors degree.
    9. Must be intelligent. (An important distinction, since there are some people with degrees who fall short in the intelligence department.) <B> **
    10. Must have good character. <B> majority of the dating pool
    11. Must be healthy. <B> pretty much the same as #2
    12. Must be interested in spirituality.
    13. Can’t be a conservative Republican. <B> majority of the dating pool
    14. Must have an interest in great literature and (or?) great art.
    15. Can’t be socially awkward. <B> majority of the dating pool
    16. Must be passionate.
    17. Must be willing to wait until marriage for sex.
    18. Any others that I’m unaware of. (non-smokers?)

    The list looks long-ish, but a lot of it can be condensed, and some of it may not be as demanding as it first appears (comments in bold on the list are mine). There’s more of a continuum for many of these categories and depending on where on that continuum Sayanta falls would determine whether or not her expectations are quixotic or feasible.

    In relation to
    #1 ambitious : In comments #124-135ish in the Why Don’t Men Like Smart, Strong, Successful Women thread there was plenty discussion of what ambitious actually means. If you’re looking for someone super-driven who wants to have an income in the top 1% of the population, then it’s a small group. Or if it’s just ambitious enough to get through college and have a solid job, then that’s a far larger group of people. Also, being ambitious does not necessarily link with advancing himself materially. Someone might earn $100k but spend it all, and even be in debt because they spend beyond their means. But someone earning $50k might actually have more money in the bank (in the present and in retirement) because they’re more frugal and sock the money away. Again, depending on which meaning Sayanta has it could widen or narrow her dating pool.
    #2 (advance physically) and #11 (be healthy); I’d say that these are so close that they’re essentially the same group. Again, there’s variety here as well. Is it someone with a 6-pack, or who isn’t perfectly toned but can do most athletic activities, or someone a bit overweight but still can do most things, or?

    #7 sexually attractive; I’d assume that this is whatever Sayanta finds sexually attractive, and everyone wants a partner toward whom they feel sexual attraction. Now if she only finds 9s and 10s attractive then it’s quite limiting, but again, the wider the range of what she finds attractive, the larger her dating pool gets.

    #9 intelligent; Are we talking Einstein? Jeopardy Tournament of Champions champ? Local Trivial Pursuit nerd? Someone who understands literary and historical allusions? Someone who may not be as interested in book-stuff but is crazy-knowledgeable about construction or music or nature or? Or just someone who learns stuff quickly? Again, there are varying degrees of intelligence and some would constitute decent chunks of the population.

    These are the main things that come to mind with the Karl/Sayanta list. Depending on Sayanta’s interpretations of these terms, she could still be open to considering a variety of men, or it could be extremely limiting. Don’t know why I’m going on about this, but just wanted to say that it’s not entirely possible for us to know if Sayanta’s tilting at windmills or if she really will win it all.

  21. 112
    Heather

    My but there’s a lot of reading here!

    I’m curious to know, Sayanta, have you ever met someone like the man you hope to meet/marry someday? If you have, then whatever is on your list is reasonable to ask for. Sometimes we do meet people who are not in any way like the dreamboat we imagined for ourselves and despite having ‘flaws’ or not having certain qualities we thought were must-haves these people add to or help us redefine that list of qualifications a bit. I think one of the beauties of falling for someone is that very phenomenon.

    If anyone cares to know a funny story about my ‘love life’ – last weekend I ended up unexpectedly spending the night with the guy I’ve had a crush on for about 18 months. I slept with him … in the sense that I slept in his bed next to him. There were no amorous interactions. I swear this type of thing only happens to me! But, since I’m still giddy from spending time with him, I think it’s cute and sort of funny ;)

  22. 113
    Joe

    Well Jeez, Heather, why didn’t you jump his bones? :D

  23. 114
    Sayanta

    A-L-

    Like Janet, you seem to be understanding my point as well- thank you!

    No, I’m not looking for a Nobel Prize winner who has a trust fund- is only 35 years old, and over six feet with dark hair and blue/green eyes (the latter is my favorite hair-eye combination in men :-))

    There’s no use in constantly rehashing my “list” here, because some other posters will convolute it to make it sound like I’m some high maintenance princess.

    Yes, I want someone who has broad interests, is willing to grow in all respects (advance physically does not mean 6 pack- it means eating healthy food and exercising at least twice a week). I’m not going to cross that out of what I’d like to have- because when people stop trying to learn and improve themselves, that leads to stagnancy, which leads to dead relationships. This isn’t just limited to romance; it happens with friends and family as well. This does NOT mean I don’t accept people for who they are. I am FAR from perfect myself- I realize this fact but I unconditionally love and accept myself regardless. In the same context, I can easily accept a man with imperfections- and I have no choice there, since we’re all imperfect- and love him and support him unconditionally anyway, as I hope he’d do with me. To quote an Eastern parable, there is perfection in imperfection.

    A trend I’ve noticed here, is that I keep writing pretty broad things about spirituality, emotion, etc. that I look for in a person, and then Karl R comes out with some analogy having to do with tennis partners and supermodel looks. This is hysterical, since, to my knowlege, none of the things I’ve ever said I look for in a partner can be considered shallow.

    Yes, I know that ‘shallow’ is a relative term, but Karl R mentioned two things:

    1) What if a guy met me and didn’t want me because I don’t play tennis? (I’m paraphrasing)

    2) Would Janet be congratulating me if I was a 40 year old truck driver looking for a hot 18 year old?

    Again, I repeat. I repeat. I don’t understand how someone with intellectual curiosity and willingness to grow (in the relationship and otherwise) can be compared to seeking sports partners and supermodel looks.

    And now to the looks things- I NEVER said anywhere that I want a supermodel. There seems to be a hidden assumption somewhere that I’m only looking for Johnny Depp. In fact, sometimes when I tell friends about my crushes, they’ll give me a strange look and say ‘you like him?’ It’s all about that je ne sais quois for me, at the risk of sounding pretentious.

    Yes, the college degree and age difference thing might be considered “strict” requirements to some- oh well. Sue me.

    As for sex, I’ve said I’d wait for COMMITMENT. Originally I did say marriage, but I later changed that- a fact that got lost in my bazillion posts. Understandable.

    I’ve also said I’m open to race, ethnicity,religion, etc. even though most Indian (my own race) men I’ve met have not had the most progressive views about women. Again, this does not mean (I hope) that none of them do. The fact that I’m not willing to consider someone who has conservative views on women’s role was implied to be a ridiculous requirement.

    I ask you -as a professional woman and feminist- how can I, for example, date a guy who thinks women’s role is to stay at home and serve their man? I don’t have a problem with women who do this, by the way, I just probably wouldn’t do it myself. And things like that change once kids come along anyway.

    Okay, I’m done here. For now.

  24. 116
    Sayanta

    EMK-

    LOL- you know what, I was actually going to say something about feeling your pain.

  25. 117
    Janet

    I’ve observed quite a bit of misquoting and misinterpretations on both sides, to be frank.

  26. 118
    Heather

    @Joe #113

    I’m not that kind of girl! :P

    Actually, and this is a subject for an entire other discussion, there’s another reason I don’t/can’t initiate sex … I have herpes and I feel obligated to disclose this before anything physical goes down. You can imagine how this takes a lot of the spontaneity and reckless abandon out of my life. I don’t feel right making a move on a guy when I know I’m just going to have to stop halfway and drop that info. on him before anything can happen. Talk about mood killer! It really sucks, but what can I do about it?:(

  27. 119
    Karl R

    Sayanta said: (#114)
    “Karl R comes out with some analogy having to do with tennis partners and supermodel looks. This is hysterical, since, to my knowlege, none of the things I’ve ever said I look for in a partner can be considered shallow.”
    “I don’t understand how someone with intellectual curiosity and willingness to grow (in the relationship and otherwise) can be compared to seeking sports partners and supermodel looks.”

    Do you think the universe is going to reward you with a partner because you’re focused on “deep” traits? Do you think the universe punishes people who focus on “shallow” traits.

    My question is whether you can attain a partner with the traits you seek.

    Sayanta said: (#106)
    “The thing that no one seemed to be getting about my list is that most of it goes to character, personality, and interests, and how a couple can mesh without these things is beyond me.”

    The man seeking a tennis partner is seeking someone who shares his greatest interest. How is it more shallow for him to do this than you?

    Sayanta said: (#114)
    “Karl R mentioned:
    Would Janet be congratulating me if I was a 40 year old truck driver looking for a hot 18 year old?”

    Read my description again. I described a couple that you mentioned here:
    http://www.evanmarckatz.com/blog/why-does-my-older-boyfriend-kick-me-out-before-his-kids-wake-up-give-me-some-relationship-advice/#comment-52921
    You know these people. And despite the traits that this man is seeking (and despite his apparent lack of qualities), he met and is dating a woman with those traits.

    His wish list is attainable.

    Sayanta said: (#114)
    “I’m not looking for a Nobel Prize winner who has a trust fund- is only 35 years old, and over six feet with dark hair and blue/green eyes”
    Sayanta said: (#52)
    I’ve never been in anything serious at all! And I haven’t met wonderful guys, period.

    To me, this is the ultimate test of how reasonable your criteria are. I have dated several amazing women (regardless of how deep or shallow my criteria are). It is reasonable to assume I will be able to do so in the future, should my current relationship end.

    You have not met anyone met any single men you would describe as “wonderful,” much less been in a serious relationship with them.

    Based on your own words, it seems that the man who meets your criteria may be unattainable.

    What is the purpose of your criteria? The purpose seems to be to help you obtain a good partner. But I’ve gotten the impression that your criteria are preventing you from obtaining any partner (good or bad).

    I’m not your enemy. I’m not preventing you from finding a relationship with a wonderful man.

    Janet asked: (#105)
    And does [your girlfriend] know and accept that you have a potential spare in the background should things not work out

    I checked. I had discussed some part of that story with her around a month ago. She seemed more offended by the idea that she might have an issue with it. Her words:“I am not an unreasonable person.”

    She did say she might have found the conversation “somewhat off-putting” if I had explained it poorly.

  28. 120
    Sayanta

    Karl, my brother, I’m impressed that you’ve combed this site to find my precise words on all these different posts. I feel like a politician!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>