Should I Keep Dating Him Even Though Religion Might Tear Us Apart?

Should I Keep Dating Him Even Though Religion Might Tear Us Apart?

Evan, I’m really enjoying your advice. I have what I think is an unusual situation. I’ve been dating a very religious Catholic man for more than a year; I am not Catholic. I am divorced, and he says that for him to consider marrying me, I need an annulment through the Catholic Church – a long (up to two-year), arduous process.

I love him, but the thought of waiting two more years to find out what will happen with us seems really stressful. We’re both in our 40s and frankly, I don’t feel like I have a lot of time to waste. He’s made it clear that if my annulment is denied, he’s breaking up with me. In addition, he hasn’t PROMISED me that we’ll get married if I get my annulment, but only says it’s probable. What to do?

We spend almost all our free time together, tell each other we love each other, attend each other’s family functions — everything is great. But the thought of binding myself to someone a little more and a little more each day only to face the possibility of being told “Sorry, we have to break up” is almost unfathomable. Help. –Lee

I completely agree with you, Lee.

And without going on an anti-religious screed, all I can say is that this is where religious dogmatists lose me – putting centuries-old Church edicts over the practicalities of modern life.

Are you willing to marry a man who puts the needs of his church ahead of the needs of his wife?

Essentially, your boyfriend is telling you that the Catholic Church’s opinion and approval of your marriage is more important than your own individual needs.

That is completely in line with the teachings of the church and he is being completely consistent with his faith. You can’t fault him in that regard.

But you do have a very serious choice to make, at this point in time.

Are you willing to marry a man who puts the needs of his church ahead of the needs of his wife?

Moreover, are you willing to take a chance that a man who doesn’t exercise free will over his own choices in life is going to be a good husband and father? As you said yourself; if, for whatever reason, the church denies your annulment, he’s breaking up with you. And it’s not even a guarantee that you’ll be married (much less happily married) if the annulment comes through.

Are you willing to take a chance that a man who doesn’t exercise free will over his own choices in life is going to be a good husband and father?

I’m generally not one to give out validation in this space, but I’m highly sympathetic to the way you’re feeling.

One of the things that makes my life so charmed is the ability that I have to exercise control over it. I’m my own boss, offering my own opinion to women who seem to value it. I have a very accepting wife. And when someone else tries to exert her will in such a way that’s uncomfortable to me (my Mom or my wife’s Mom, for example), I maintain the right act in a way that works for my nuclear family.

This is a choice I made: to not prostrate myself to others’ dictates.

You’ve chosen a boyfriend who has already picked sides.

Compromising with you for your happiness is out of the question.

If your relationship will work, it’s going to be about you, compromising for the sake of the Catholic Church.

Personally, that wouldn’t work for me.

And, from the tone of your note, I’m guessing it doesn’t really work for you either. As tough as it is, religion is one of those issues that will impact the rest of your life. If you can’t find a path to meet halfway, I would highly suggest you find yourself a new partner who will.

Just have faith. With no disrespect to your boyfriend, there are MILLIONS of men out there who can make you happy, and will put your needs above the church’s policies.

0
0

Join 7 Million Readers

And the thousands of women I've helped find true love. Sign up for weekly updates for help understanding men.

I hate spam as much as you do, therefore I will never sell, rent, or give away your email address.

Join our conversation (42 Comments).
Click Here To Leave Your Comment Below.

Comments:

  1. 31
    Angela

    I am a bit taken aback by the insulting nature of the follow up comment to mine, as I don’t feel Lille my post was the least bit attacking towards anyone.  I merely was stating that I could potentially see myself asking a future spouse to take the same steps as the OP’s boyfriend and I am entirely committed to finding true, lifelong love again.
     
    I’m interested in hearing the thoughts of those who reacted negatively to this scenario now that Evan has posted the follow up article involving a Jewish man.  Is it completely absurd for a Jewish boyfriend to require that a woman convert prior to marriage since the lineage is passed thru the mother?  Or is it just the traditions of those of us who allow “creepy old men in skirts to make our life’s choices” that is problematic?  If one partner is an atheist, should that automatically trump a partner who associates with a religion?  And why?  The logic here is absurd.  in my opinion, a relationship is a MUTUAL agreement to make concessions when needed for the whole.  I don’t think asking a future spouse to get an annulment, which means much to me and takes little from him, should mean that my partner should “run”.  

    1. 31.1
      Evan Marc Katz

      Angela, for some reason, however, you seem to be focused on religion in the abstract instead of focusing on the OP’s original question. Her question wasn’t about a quick and easy annulment, in general. It was whether she should go through the sometimes arduous process of annulment for a man who has not proposed, promised a proposal, or guaranteed that he would still marry her if the annulment didn’t come thru. This man has given her ZERO job security and he’s asking her to undergo a process entirely for HIS needs. So my answer to her isn’t based on my feelings about religion – it’s about my feelings on selfishness and stubbornness.

      I didn’t ask my wife to “convert” for me, because a) it’s not my place to tell her how to believe. She’s a Catholic. b) it seems a pointless exercise when someone doesn’t believe in what she’s doing and c) my children being Jewish is dependent upon how I raise them, not upon some matrilineal bloodline tradition that has been passed down for 5000 years. My wife is Catholic. My kids are Jewish. We’re all cool with this compromise.

      The OP is clearly NOT cool with this compromise, because her boyfriend is not doing ANY compromising. He’s putting Catholicism before love. That’s his prerogative if he thinks an annulment is more important than the OP. But it also means the OP has a perfectly valid reason to question her relationship with a man who is so insensitive to her needs. Any other anti-religious thing you’re inferring comes from your own sensitivity around this issue – not from anything I wrote here.

  2. 32
    Angela

    Evan,
    I never took issue with your answer!  I fully understand your point.  Yes, I did take issue with some of the anti-religious remarks left by other commenters.  I think far too often it’s easy for those who are not followers of a faith to make overly simplistic black/ white commentaries about things that… honestly, they don’t understand.  My only response, really, to your post, was the comment that we always have to be empathetic to our partner and find the best solution for the relationship/ marriage and not always put our personal needs at the top of the hierarchy.  That said, yes, I agree that I would never ask someone to convert nor would I ask them to begin the annulment process before a solid commitment.  However… the church doctrine does state that it is a sin to even date a “still married in the eyes of the church” person, so if ya wanna get involved with a devout Catholic, you are going to be asked to get that piece of paper and that probably means that they are thinking about you in future terms!  You can view it as a negative or a positive, but there are positive connotations to it that I felt were not addressed.  If my responses came off as negative or nasty, it was not my intention.  I just see it from a different side!

  3. 33
    Kathleen

    Dump the guy and find someone great. 
    Hes wasting your life while he strings you along.  Some of the most pious people I have encountered are the most morally corrupt 

  4. 34
    Nicole

    @Angela, I can only speak for myself, but what bothers we most about this guy and a lot of organized religion is hypocrisy.  I think he’s being a hypocrite to say the rules of his faith are so important to him but then to date a non-Catholic and expect her to follow them.  And of course if they are having sex and using birth control, he’s being a hypocrite about that too.  Why is he allowed to pick and choose what rules he wants to follow?
    If being Catholic and following the rules of the Catholic church are so important to this guy, he should only date people who are as Catholic as he is.  There is a Catholic equivalent of JDate.  One of my friends who became quite dogmatic as an adult used it.  So she refers to liberal Catholics who believe in things like birth control to be ‘fake Catholics.’  I went to Mass with her…it was pretty extreme to me (I’m not Catholic but have been to Mass on several occasions).  
    Let’s take religion out of it, b/c that seems to make it hard for you to focus on the point.  If there is something that you consider a deal breaker in order for you to marry a person, then don’t date people who can’t live up to your expectations.  If he needs someone who has never been married in the eyes of the church, he either needs to date never marrieds or date Catholics who are okay annulling their marriage (I’m sure they won’t all be, but some are going to be like him).  Personally, my opinion would be the same if this girl was chubby when she met him and he told her she needed to lost 50lbs before he’d think about marrying her.  Or if he met her and she only had a high school education and he said she needed to finish college before he’d think about marrying her.  If you want what you want, then pick that to start and don’t waste people’s time with your requirements.
    The most important thing here is that he hasn’t made any promises or commitments to her but wants her to do this thing that she doesn’t believe in so he can consider possibly investing more in her.  It seems pretty selfish.
    And that just sucks.
    And for what it’s worth, I wouldn’t be hard on people who were raised Catholic, or Evangelical, or in any other strict religious household b/c they went through things you didn’t.  You got to choose to be Catholic as an adult.  And enough has come out about the Catholic church that I would not judge any former Catholic who dislikes the religion now.  I think dogma is bad, no matter what faith it is.  Lots of extremes, lots of abuses, and lots of hypocrisy, which is likely what a lot of former members of any faith are reacting to.  Organized religion is supposedly the word of God but throughout history, we see people (who are just human but as church heads get way too much power) bend and break that word to suit their own needs and desires.  Sometimes in a moral sense, and sometimes in a criminal sense.  So I think that is what evokes such a visceral reaction in people when religion comes up.  I don’t see how anyone ignores that.

  5. 35
    Goldie

    As someone that was a (pretty devout) Christian for 20 years, here’s my two cents – I think religion is not even the issue here. The OP’s boyfriend is using religion as an excuse to not fully commit to OP. If he were as devout as he says, he wouldn’t have had a year-long relationship (involving sex and birth control, I assume) with her in the first place. If he didn’t have religion as an excuse, he would’ve come up with something else. It is not his religion that is keeping them apart – they are apart because he wants them to be apart, period, end of story. He gets all of OP’s free time and commitment, and offers nothing in return. Time to say good-bye to the pious man.

  6. 36
    Jen

    Lee can analyze this on the level discussed by several posters and be done with it.  This is not a situation that is fair to her or good for her. 
     
    I am taking it to a deeper level and saying that religion as such, in my opinion, is a problem.  No one I ever knew was able to be a completely good Catholic, because the religion demanded faith, sacrifice, humility, and out of context rules.  None of these fit with my life, my view of reality, or my thoughts of a good partner.  If it works for someone else and their partner, more power to them.  I would be interested to know how that is the case.  Probably by ignoring most inconvenient aspects of the religion, which leads me to ‘why bother calling yourself religious’?  But I guess that is just me :)
     

  7. 37
    Ria

    l second to Goldie

  8. 38
    Vicki

    Maybe she should date an Episcopalian instead of a Catholic. Similar high-church liturgy, but no difficulties in regards to divorce, remarriage and fertility treatments. Of course, I’m not a Catholic myself.  I *have* noticed my Catholic friends are very “dyed in the wool” in ways most protestants aren’t. Most protestants are pretty fluid in terms of denominational loyalty. I might grow up in a Methodist church, but attend a Baptist church if it’s more convenient, or the congregation is friendlier. A Catholic is always a Catholic. They will always be uncomfortable with anything else.
    Also Evan: in Judaism, marriage is a social contract; however, in Christianity it is a sacrament.
    So, rearranging your idea of what marriage is in order to conform to “modern” practicalities might not seem like a big deal to someone that believes marriage is only a social contract — but it would be a VERY big deal to someone who views marriage as a sacrament.
     

  9. 39
    Lee

    Evan, I’m the OP. I thought you might like an update on this. You were dead right. He didn’t care about my emotional needs. In fact, after dating him a few more months, I found out that my very religious boyfriend had cheated on me. Yes, the man who told me that he wanted to do things “God’s way” went out on a date with another woman, took her out for drinks and took her back to her place. (I thought he was at home asleep).  He didn’t tell me about it. (Although he did tell me later on that he had confessed to a priest). The other woman told me about it, several weeks after the fact. She said he had promised her he would be breaking up with me and making her his new girlfriend, and he never did, so she was angry. All around, lies and deceit. So I broke up with him, finally. Wish I’d done it a lot sooner. He begged me to take him back. He even suddenly decided the annulment was not so important anymore and asked me to marry him. I don’t feel like I can trust him with my heart for the rest of my life, so I said no. I have moved on.
    Thank you for all you do, Evan.

  10. 40
    Henriette

    Congratulations, Lee.  I’m sure this was a very painful realisation but you have now rid yourself of someone who can bring you no true happiness.  Now you can heal and you’ve made space in your life for a man who is morally upstanding and not merely “religious.” 

  11. 41
    tree

    I’d like to direct the poster, and some of the commenters here, to interchurchfamilies.org, which is a really great resource for “mixed marriage” and interchurch couples: those who are both actively involved in different Christian denominations. The issues of being interchurch, or mixed marriage (mixed marriage can include people from different denominations who may only be active in one of them),and interfaith marriages (between faiths, rather than within Christianity), are real and painful, but can also be beautiful. The question is, do you share fundamental convictions? Do you turn to the same place for comfort when you’re hurting? If so, I encourage you to try to find support in other interchurch or mixed marriage couples and families,and work through the church issues. But, like others commenters have said, ONLY do that if you respect his obedience to the church! For him to even consider placing himself ina position where he would NEVER be welcome to receive communion again…that’s tough. That said, Pope Francis just pointed out to a couple in South America that the person who married somebody who had been divorced with no annullment should still receive communion, because THAT person was not actually in a state of sin (it was their spouse who was in a state of sin and should not receive). So, based on that, you could marry your boyfriend, -potentially- in the church, and he would not be separated from communion although you would – if you had no annullment.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>