Are You Sick Of Being Told To Compromise For Men?


If you are, I don’t blame you one bit.

You don’t want to be told that you’re doing anything wrong.

You don’t want to be told that doing the same thing always yields the same results.

You don’t want to be told that you’re responsible for change when you’ve been hurt by so many bad men.

I hear you, loud and clear.

Men are a HUGE problem. I hear about it every single day from my coaching clients.

You’ve been reading my posts for awhile and you’ve been thinking to yourself:

“Yeah, this guy seems to know what he’s talking about, but something bugs me about him. All his advice is so practical. They always talk about compromise and realistic expectations and being patient. Sorry. I don’t want to compromise and have realistic expectations and be patient! I just want to find love naturally.”

I get it: you want to feel good, and my advice doesn’t always make you feel good.

Believe it or not, I even get it when you send me emails that chastise me:


You’re clearly smart, but when will you get to the real heart of the matter? There’s nothing to do when men are the problem here. They’re awkward, cheap, sex-obsessed and selfish. They think they deserve younger women when they don’t. They’re afraid of commitment and run when you start to care for them. This is why it’s frustrating to get your advice; it’s always telling me what I should do differently, but it doesn’t address the root cause of the problem: men.


Amen, Linda. You just spoke for thousands of women who are fed up with dating, online dating and the selfish idiosyncrasies and double standards of men.

Would it surprise you if I told you I agreed with Linda?

And not just a piece of what she wrote — every single word.

Men are a HUGE problem. I hear about it every single day from my coaching clients. I would not pretend for a second that you have it easy in trying to find a suitable lifelong partner. Dating is really tricky and I couldn’t be more sympathetic to your struggles.

Still, you have to admit, saying “Men are the problem” doesn’t begin to solve any problems. All it does is point fingers.

But let’s look at men another way — since that’s my job as a male dating coach who specializes in helping women. And let’s find agreement on all of these points:

You want to date a man, right? So if these awful creatures are the ones you’re attracted to, we have to figure out how to make the best of it. Your alternatives — dating women and giving up on love — are options, but I’m guessing they’re not Plan A.

You’ve met men before who aren’t awkward, cheap, sex-obsessed and selfish, right? You’ve met men who date women their own age. You’ve met men who are devoted companions, men who have been married for many years. If these men exist, it only stands to reason that they could make for an excellent partner. And before you exclaim that they’re all taken, that’s not true either. It makes no sense to think that the only kind, giving, relationship oriented people over the age of 35 are women.

You can’t change men. You can only change yourself.

If a man does prove to be of low character: stupid, selfish, abusive, addicted, inconsistent, and uninterested in a future with you, my advice has always been the same: leave him. We can agree on that, right?

I don’t have the power to change men. I don’t have the mandate to change men. Men don’t read this kind of dating advice, much less from a dating coach who works with “smart, strong, successful women.” As such, any blog post in which I write advice for men to change would be a big waste of space. Right?

You don’t have the power or mandate to change men either. Any man you respect will be quite resentful of the fact that you want to change him, as you’d have the right to resent any man who actively tried to change you. Change comes from within.

If you agree with all 5 bullet points, we’ve thereby concluded:

You want to date a man.
Some men are good potential partners.
Bad partners should be dumped.
I can’t change men.
You can’t change men. You can only change yourself.

And if that’s the case, you may understand why my posts never point the finger at men or focus on how men need to change. It’s not because they’re not partially “at fault” for things; it’s because they’re not reading my advice.

You are. You’re reading this because something’s not working. You’re reading this because you really do want to fall in love. You’re reading this because, deep down, you know that the only thing you can do is persevere and adjust — as opposed to changing the behavior of men.

So the next time I write a post that challenges you, or frustrates you, or asks you to do something different, please consider why I’m saying it.

I’m saying it because if blaming men is a waste of time, and your previous way of dating hasn’t worked, the ONLY way to get a new result is to open up to a NEW way.

Stick with me. Not because it always feels great. But because I have your back and I will always tell you the TRUTH about what’s going on with men.

The truth, as you know, isn’t always pretty.

But it will set you free.

Join our conversation (165 Comments).
Click Here To Leave Your Comment Below.


  1. 1

    I think another way of saying it is, who is the common denominator in serial failed relationships or dating dissatisfaction? If you do what you’ve always done, you’re going to get what you’ve always gotten. Nothing changes if nothing changes.  

  2. 2

    I think this is really important for women to understand, because the reality is it’s a lot easier to connect with a man and make a relationship work if one person (the woman) is willing to change and mold herself into what he wants in order to make it work. One of my married colleagues always tells me “Of course men want to get married, who wouldn’t want a wife?” I think it goes back to one of your earlier posts about men being more content in singleness than women.

    I think your sentiments are right on, but for today’s smart, successful woman it places her at a crossroads: be yourself and face being alone or change or fix something about your behavior so that a man will find you more acceptable. Much of the pain that women feel is a frustration and disappointment of giving up this person they’ve been, for however long, so that she can find love which leads to feelings of not being enough, for some women this is when bitterness sets in. And this wouldn’t be so bad if it disproportionally affect women. I don’t mean to sound fatalistic about relationships because I think love is so important, but this is why many women may end up alone, because they will not be willing to make these sacrifices.

    1. 2.1

      … it’s a lot easier to connect with a man and make a relationship work if one person (the woman) is willing to change and mold herself into what he wants in order to make it work.

      This will not make  very many women happy I suspect. We are  not living in the 1950s. We are  not dependent on men anymore.  We are earning our own money. We  are having  children  outside of relationships.  We may want  men but we do not  actually need them. So we  can change it up. We can expect and demand more.  If the object of our affection  is “awkward, cheap, sex-obsessed and selfish” (well put Linda)  and wants to stay this way? Ciao baby.

    2. 2.2
      mean mandy

      There are more men that end up alone than women, why should only women change? A woman can bring money into her home, she can take care of kids and she can have kids alone, where does the men fit into this? they should be the ones who need to change their behaviour otherwise they will end up lone virgin losers.

  3. 3

    Compromises are necessary in all relationships – between friends as well as in dating relationships.
    What I have found is that in order for a relationship to last, not only must we love or like traits and behaviors of our mate, but we must be able to tolerate those that we do not like.   These nagging little ( or not so little) things that are inevitable in our loved one must not bother us enough to cause grinding of teeth or stomach knots.
    A close friend was dating a much older and sophisticated man who had really “been around”.   He had a habit that used to irritate many of his friends.   (Prefer not to say what it was.)   She found it amusing and even endearing!   They could have married and probably been very happy but he died of a heart attack.   I knew him and liked him very much.

  4. 4

    I think a big part of the problem is that many women are notactually attracted to men. We THINK we are attracted to men, but what we are attracted to is a big strong caring committed movie hero type man, not the creatures we actually have around us. Women have evolved a lot in the last few decades, more quickly than a lot of men have, and the regular guys around us (who were attractive to our mothers and grandmothers) are not actually that attractive to us. Many of our mothers and grandmothers were happy enough to marry emotionally distant, housework-shy sexually inept men, or men who thought nothing of carrying on with other women, because from their perspective, they got something out of it: they got out from their parents homw, they received financial support and they got to have children and be part of normal adult society. For many of us today, these things are not what we want men for….but the men around are still the same!
    Speaking for myself, I like men in general, and the things I like about them are: they are less two faced than women – if a man likes you, he talks to you. If he doesn’t like you, he ignores you. He doesn’t tell you he loves your shoes then bitches about you behind your back. Also, they’re good at fixing things, and love taking the car to the garage when it needs done. They are good at carrying heavy bags. They give good hugs. You can have sex with them. Sometimes they buy you things or take you places or let you have a go on their motorbike. They are good at sorting out problems on the PC. Some of them even cook. They smell nice. They tell you you look cute. They adore your boobs. They are less emotional than women froiends, which I find relaxing. I think it helps, on the whole, if you consider them like some sort of exotic pet…. like a giraffe. If you like giraffes, you like giraffes. But it would be absurd to expect them to stop being giraffes.They eat all the high leaves off all of your plants and they shit when they feel like it, they don’t say much and no, they will never “get” the importance of pot pourri. But that’s just them. If you don’t like them, that’s fair enough, but tha5t it what they are like.

    1. 4.1

      The real problem is that you have all become the  chauvinists and your just mad that men wont play that game…that we are not going to become narcissistically critical of ourselves and just like you dont want to be treated like a house hold appliance we dont. Your comic book caricature of what men act like is staight out of an archy comic and not at all what REAL(and not boys in mens bodies) men are like.

    2. 4.2


    3. 4.3
      Siobhan Downes

      Love it Helene x x  

    4. 4.4

      Helene, so many of the pointers you raised here connected women-are evolving exponentially and the men are well, well men… can I ask you where did you meet the man the fixes your PC? 😊 That is a Giraffe I could possibly date.

    5. 4.5

      “Women have evolved a lot in the last few decades, more quickly than a lot of men have”


      Are you kidding me? Such drivel.


      I’ll grant you the giraffe though – just another way of saying what Evan does.



    6. 4.6

      Great response! I just laughed out loud in my cubical at work. I think I will secretly start calling all men giraffes from now on. I used to call them PDBs, Poor Dumb Bastards, but giraffe is better. Thanks for the giggle 🙂

  5. 5
    Lisa M.

    I totally agree. Women are the ones asking for advice on this site so the onus is on us to make some adjustments to find love. I don’t think Evan is saying that we should twist ourselves in a pretzel in order to appease jerks and a-holes. It’s simple; if a guy doesn’t possess the qualities you are seeking in a mate make no attempts to change him because it’s a colossal waste of time and energy, just simply move on. I know that’s hard for many women. But to be honest I don’t understand why exactly, I never really got that. The moment a guy shows himself to be unworthy; I’m done.
    I’m certainly not perfect. Like I mentioned, when I first posted here; I have never been in a long-term relationship and I’m 36 years-old. And I’m well aware of what the problem is; I’m commitment phobic. I’ve known this for over a year now and I know I have to make some adjustments in my attitude towards relationships and commitment. However, the men I’ve met over the years haven’t helped to make commitment appealing to me but I still want to fall in love and I know the onus is on me if that’s going to happen.

    1. 5.1

      It’s simple; if a guy doesn’t possess the qualities you are seeking in a mate make no attempts to change him because it’s a colossal waste of time and energy, just simply move on.  … But to be honest I don’t understand why exactly, I never really got that.  

      I’d like to offer a reason. It’s because the men in question have SOME of the qualities, or MOST of the qualities MOST of the time. Let’s say you want a man who is honest, helps at home, wants a family,  and is loving.

      -There’s the guy who is honest…except with his family…or  when he wants to say no.

      -There’s the guy who  fixes your car, helps you move, or cooks dinner for you and your kids….but when you argue, he yells and slams doors.

      -There’s the guy who wants a family, but insists that 90% of child related activities are “mom duties”.

      -There’s the guy who is loving….when you do what he wants to do, instead of being unconditional.

      Men, like women, are flawed human beings with  many wonderful and some not-so-wonderful traits.

      It’s wishful thinking that this person, who has so many great qualities, did not have the awful ones as well. A lot of people just can’t let go of the fantasy that the awful qualities are often permanent parts of that person’s character, as opposed to one-time-only actions unrelated to who that person is or what they value.

      It takes knowing yourself better to determine if those awful qualities are deal breakers for you or not. Typically, if these flaws are character or value based, they are usually deal breakers. Non character flaws might be open for negotiation with those individuals, and should fall into the ‘loving them unconditionally’ category.

      1. 5.1.1

        typo – the awful qualities are *not* permanent parts of that person’s character

  6. 6

    To Helene who posted above….you are a HOOT !!   Thanks for making me smile, and very astute also  !

  7. 7
    Lisa M.

    I get what you’re saying about men but as women we need to be much more discriminating when it comes to men. We let them get away with way too much shit.   I think as women we put way too much importance on being with them.   I’m a recovering commitment probe and my biggest fear in getting involved  with a man was that I believed I would lose my independence and autonomy.   So, I never made men a big priority in my life (I’m not saying  it was a healthy choice. And yes, I’m heterosexual).   As a result, I often see them for exactly who they are and not for whom I would like for them to be and I have very little tolerance for them when they are not treating me right because I don’t need them to validate me. But I am open to meeting a man to love and share my life with. Not because I’m afraid of being alone or care what people think (and I’m talking about women in general not you).
    We just need to put less value on them and more on ourselves, that’s all I’m saying.

    1. 7.1
      Siobhan Downes

      So true Lisa…..nowadays we dont NEED them as much, so we are less willing to put up with crap…. im very independent and will not tolerate being badly treated. But it amazes me how selfish some are and how much they try to get away with….i just walk! I love my freedom to b honest, dont know if i will ever settle  

    2. 7.2
      Marcy B.

      Lisa, I agree with you. As an avid romance novel reader, I recently questioned where all the male romance writer are. The gist of my findings were that while men write about romance, the romance is something that happens as part of a larger plot (usually some major event in which the man gets to show off is abilities). Women romance writers, however, make the interaction between the man and woman the theme of the book. Understanding that men and women are different, I was nevertheless concerned about this difference. It brought to mind a bible scripture in the Book of Genesis (Her desire shall be toward her husband (the male), and he shall rule over her.) Here, was a prediction that the woman would be obsessed with having the presence of a man in her life. And he would rule over her. I think the rulership of the man occurs because of her obsession with having his presence. And her obsession was the result of her need. In the time this prediction was made, major hardship was going to come upon the earth (particularly the soil), and because of the man’s superior physique and perhaps the woman’s weaker one, she had to depend on him for food (survival). This need persisted for centuries, and still exists in many of us as females because that was how we were socialized. For us, subconsciously, men are still the presence we must have.  We actually need to adopt the way of men, assigning them the place of being part of our stories should we meet a please one along with way, rather than the focal point or aim of our story. A note: rulership here, refers here refers not only to what he demands of her, but also what he offers in return, and the attention he gives to her.  

  8. 8

    You are right! Men are NOT reading this stuff and it only makes sense to give advice to the ones who ARE reading it. I would bring home printouts for my ex to read, written BY men, FOR men, and he wouldn’t read him.   Hence, he’s my EX. LOL.   And this site isn’t for us to bitch and complain about how stupid men are, or how they don’t get it. I don’t think Evan is ever disagreeing with that, so let’s take the advice we are given, use what we can, and discard the rest. Change does come from within. We are very powerful……….over ourselves.

  9. 9

    Yes, there are good men out there, but few and far between.   In general, women want and need relationship more than men do (Read Evan’s recent post “Why don’t men hate being single as much as women do?).   Men don’t seek relationship advice, men don’t improve.   Because there are far fewer relationship-oriented men than women, the numerical odds are against women.   Women also have shorter youth, so yes we have the short end of the stick.   But we can’t change any of that.   The only  sane advice one can give  is “date actively, choose wisely, choose only the good men.”

    1. 9.1

      Hypothetically, if more women are taking advice to better themselves in order to find a happy relationship, and more women want a happy relationship  to begin with, then there are simply not enough of the “good guys” to go around. I think this is where the seeming “bitterness” comes in…. You can apply all the advice, but that will not  magically produce more quality men. There will still be a lower percentage of quality men in proportion to women when it comes to relationships.

      1. 9.1.1

        “There will still be a lower percentage of quality men in proportion to women when it comes to relationships.”


        Aye, when with this old gem die.


        Men have different relationship needs from women – that you odn’t understand this difference/can’t grasp it, doesn’t make men “lesser” at relationships.


        It makes them different.

        1. Echoes

          Strawman. I was exploring the premise the author presented. I didn’t say it was true, hence the word “hypothetically”.

          This is not about needs or what one seeks, but what one can offer. The author states men are not likely to read self help material to become better partners and he seems to imply they are less driven to self-improvement as it relates to relationships (ie be able and willing to give what the other person needs/wants). If this is not true, fine, but explain why instead of needlessly taking offense at an idea I never stated.

        2. Echoes

          One more thing…. If the different things most men seek in “relationships” are inherently incompatible with what most women seek, then again we have a numbers issue.

    2. 9.2

      I’m still trying to  figure out  if it’s true  that we women have the short end of this stick. I do believe that  there are as many good men  out there as there as there are good women, but that doesn’t translate into good relationships unfortunately.

      I think there are a couple of aspects to our current predicament. One is the  biological clock, which puts us at a disadvantage. Just as  greater physical strength (in most cases) is the origin of men’s dominance over women in the patriarchal system, men’s ability to reproduce much later into life is  the basis  of their upper-hand in the dating/relationship game today.   So we get the shorter end of the stick on a biological plane. However, we get longer end of the stick these days in that we can have children without a partner – which most men still can’t do.

      I don’t know that I believe that women are more evolved than men, but I do believe we are more involved in our personal development – as it’s only really been an option for us for the  last 70 years or so, whereas men have been able to pursue their personal development for centuries.  I do think there is a lag time for development involved, with men being a  little slower on the uptake (as it is on the  physical  front with child development and puberty). This is not meant as an insult. I’m suggesting that as far as personal evolution is concerned, it may happen later in life for men than it does for many women. What that means is that we are finding less compatibility with men in the same age-group and may need to go up a decade if we want to be on the same page.

      The other thing is that one of the down-sides of marriage no longer being socially required is that a lot of men who are more freedom-oriented than commitment-oriented no longer need to marry to live socially acceptable lives. And sex is now freely available with no strings attached and no payment required – other than a few drinks or a dinner. That means less unhappy marriages, but it also means less marriages. Only men who want to commit need to these days. And I would say there are more women than men  with a desire for commitment. And on the whole, men who come around to the idea of commitment, come around a lot later.

      So where does that leave us….

  10. 10
    Charles J. Orlando

    I would agree. As I’ve written: “Is the problem with women… men? Yes, however women need to apply the brakes on how men are allowed to treat them MUCH earlier in their relationships. Men can only treat women the way it is ALLOWED. Women can avoid many damaging relationship issues by demanding more, and by not sacrificing their self-esteem and self-worth in an effort to “contribute” to their relationships by placating the man in their life.”   –Charles J. Orlando, author of The Problem with Women… is Men

  11. 11

    I think a lot of the problem is women ruling men out, often for very silly reasons. The other issue is treating every man who is single as a potential partner, and coming across as desperate.

    Let me know what you think, I’d love to have some feedback on my site!

    1. 11.1

      But, I know a lot of men who think that EVERY woman who they meet think they want them or are their wife too. It ruins the whole relationship and makes them appear arrogant.

  12. 12

    I think the female readers agree with Evan more than we realize.   And while we certainly don’t want to constantly be male-bashing, sometimes it feels good to vent.   It doesn’t mean we’ve stopped agreeing, it means we need to get something out of our system so we can move on.   Sometimes we just want to be heard.

  13. 13

    Thank you for the acknowledgment of bad male behavior, Evan.     It seems to me that half of the “discussions” happening in the comments section could be solved by simply acknowledging the other’s perspective and experience.   More than that, I think that we still live live in a sexist society and women deal with this on a daily basis and frustration builds up from that, too.   I had to laugh recently when I read a slanted article about Maria Shriver, accusatorialy claiming that she “had to have known” that her husband was nailing the housekeeper.   I wondered to myself if women — especially those over 35 — ever catch a break.   Luckily, i stay away from commercial media as much as possible, so I don’t regularly expose myself to that sort of regular frustration.
    Despite these things going on at a societal level and what I’ve experienced as an individual, I still had to come to some sort of reckoning with myself after two marriages to abusive men.   Nobody held a gun to my head and forced me to marry these men… though I know that being desperate circumstances definitely contributed to one marriage.   The common denominator was *me*.
    For my new dating path, I’m taking things very slowly, investing a lot in myself in terms of my career, health and activities, and keeping high standards for myself and anyone I date.   I realize that this post is about learning to compromise, but in my case, I’ve learned that the compromise that I most need to keep making is learning to give less and let the man be a man more often.   If he is not up for that, then I realize that this is a sign and he is probably someone who still has some growing to do… and that is a sign to move on.   As a natural nurturer this is really tough, but by having high standards, I end up wasting less time and having higher quality interactions when they do happen.   So far, I’m very satisfied with this approach.
    Why do you think that women who flirt with single men seem “desperate?”   I am confused by this because women are encouraged to flirt, but when they do it, it seems like there is someone accusing them of acting “desperate.”   I wonder if this is an ageist criticism — like if it was a 25-year-old flirting with a guy she wouldn’t likely be accused of acting “desperate,”   right?   I would like to know your thoughts on this.

  14. 14

    I think the big issue is WHEN are you “compromising”, or WHEN are you being foolhardy?

    I can remember being younger and dating people simply because it was another person to have involved in my life.   I’d honestly tell guys I was dating in my early 20s “I can’t see myself marrying you… or getting married at all” just b/c of my age and maturity.   This didn’t mean “I don’t find you attractive” or “I dislike you”.   It just meant “I am not emotionally or mentally ready to say I know what I want forever”.

    I had a boyfriend move cities for me (after I said “Don’t do that, I can’t see myself marrying you”) and blowing up b/c he made all of these “compromises”.

    Was the problem “me”?   For him, yes, but the problem was also him not accepting what was plain as day – I didn’t want to think about long-term  commitment.

    It is very easy for me to understand men might be this same way (or instead of “not ready for marriage”… wanting to date a model, whatever).   But “awkward”… yes, I’ve been around some awkward men.   Cheap… yup.   Definitely a few of those.   Sex-obsessed… who isn’t (unless it’s like the previous OP’s boyfriend)?

    But SELFISH???   The best way I heard “selfish” described is not someone who does what they want to do.   It’s someone who expects others to do what they want.   Of course, a man should step up if he is being a husband and a father.   Other people are dependent on him.   But a single guy playing the field…

    Evan is right.   Dump him if he’s not willing to compromise.  

  15. 15

    The only way for women to change men is to constantly, all the time, always refuse to put up with not being treated right.   We all need to go back to some “old fashioned” standards, that often  need to be relearned.   Now a days men don’t even seem to remember what treating a woman well means, and a lot of women don’t remember either.   Even older men don’t know.   And in some ways I can’t blame them.   A lot women have taught men that it’s okay to treat women badly.   Men can be as sloppy as they want and many, many women will just accept that behavior as fine because they don’t want to be alone.   Women need to be willing to say NO to bad behaviour and if it means they are alone they need to realize being alone is way better than being treated badly.

    I really believe that if  ALL women refused bad behavior from the men that they date, things would  turn around fast.   Men would have to change if they could no longer get what they want  no matter how they acted.    Come on women – that’s the real power that we possess.     We need to stand up to bad behavior and enjoy being alone if being with a man means being treated badly.   No man is worth bad behavior – none.   And being alone, standing up for yourself, is truly liberating!

    1. 15.1

      Well said, Claudia! I couldn’t have said it better myself…and, in fact, I have both thought and said these very words to myself and to my female counterparts in the past. I realize it’s idealistic and unrealistic in this sex-crazed pornographic society where women will get naked for a tee-shirt but, it’s true. If every woman realized how she deserves to be treated and acted like it, we wouldn’t have this problem of men being idiots….at least not to this extent. They’d shape up real quick because their options would be to turn gay or be alone. It’s simple economics that operate under the principle of scarcity…plain and simple. But, as you said, Claudia…it only works if ALL women do it and start to understand this principle. Because if not, the same problem will continue to exist because what men can’t get cheaply with one woman is no big deal…all they have to do is turn on their porn or go to a bar for a one night stand or find a needy woman somewhere who doesn’t know her worth and they will settle for that to get what they want in the moment. Problem solved… for them. Unfortunately, it hurts all women everywhere every time this happens.

  16. 16

    No one has ever mentioned this, but you know men have mothers.   Why aren’t mothers teaching their sons how to treat women?   I know that when my father was growing up, my grandmother wouldn’t allow him to be disrespectful to his girlfriends and then ultimately his wife.   I am just asking a question so I hope the mothers on here don’t get angry, but it really is something I wonder about.

    1. 16.1

      I wonder about it, too, Kenley.

  17. 17

    We as women can solve this problem if someone would only write a book about how to change Men!!   Well, you know, not entirely, just their bad habits.   :- )

  18. 18
    Node ³

    This sort of victim mentality poisons relationships before they even start.   Women who come to a first date with the mindset that men in general are uncouth lowlifes will be defensive, which translates into being unfun.   When there’s no second date, they probably blame me.   Make sure you’re judging each man on his own merits.
    That’s one piece of the puzzle.   The other problem is that dating is a low feedback environment.   I’ve had women freeze me out after a date, and I’m always left wondering if my behavior was too awkward, cheap, sex-obsessed or selfish, among other things.   If it was, I’ll never know, and carry that behavior over to the next woman.   One of the first principles of behavior modification is that the target behavior needs to be well-defined, so if you’re serious about changing a man’s behavior, point   out exactly what’s wrong as soon as it happens (immediacy is also a core component of behavior modification).   Many men will probably surprise you by at least making an effort to shape up.
    Last, make sure your expectations are reasonable.   The inclusion of “cheap” in the letter writer’s list of faults throws up red flags for me.   She may be one of those “Buy me stuff or I’ll leave” types.   Stuff isn’t really that important, especially if you haven’t been dating long, so focus on more important traits like emotional maturity and faithfulness, which pay off in the long run.

  19. 19

    If you feel you are compromising too much, then you are with the wrong man. Get out!

  20. 20

    I somewhat disagree, saying that men are the problem is a bit of a general statement, and not all men are as linda puts it are “awkward, cheap, sex-obsessed and selfish and think they deserve a younger woman”

    I am a man and I fall into non of those categories, I think (and I risk being persecuted) that women have to accept some responsibility, if you agree to have a relationship with a man that will treat you like rubbish then dont be angry with him, you are the one that agreed to be with him.

    Women always complain about “nice guys” but then go for someone that treats them rubbish – then they point the finger at all men and say we are all dogs.

    Well I’m a nice guy – a married one for that matter and my wife loves me just that way – and I dont fall in the category of cheap, awkward, selfish or sex obsessed.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *